4.2 Article

Systematic revision of Gyriabrus (Rodentia, Caviomorpha), a large dinomyid from the Neogene of South America

期刊

HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 347-355

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2022.2042810

关键词

Late Miocene; Mammalia; ontogeny; body mass; palaeobiogeography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the unique dental anatomy of Gyriabrus among euhypsodont dinomyids, confirming its status as a valid genus. It proposes an ontogenetic series for Gyriabrus species and discusses the taxonomic status of different species found in various regions during the late Miocene to Pliocene.
Dinomyidae is a family of rodents including one extant species, Dinomys branickii, but with a high past diversity. Gyriabrus is a large dinomyid with euhypsodont cheek teeth and an occlusal pattern that changes throughout the ontogeny of the animal. Eight species of Gyriabrus have been described in the late Miocene to Pliocene of Argentina, Uruguay, Colombia and Brazil. The taxonomic status of Gyriabrus has been questioned, being considered as juvenile forms of other euhypsodont dinomyids. According to this study, Gyriabrus has a unique dental anatomy among euhypsodont dinomyids and is a valid genus. A study of the cheek teeth permitted to propose an ontogenetic series. All the species described from the late Miocene of Argentina (Ituzaingo Formation) and Uruguay (Camacho Formation) belong to Gyriabrus holmbergi (including G. glutinatus, G. rebagliattii, G. indivisus and G. teisseirei), representing different wear stages. ?Gyriabrus quadratus, G. latidens (late Pliocene? of Argentina) and ?G. royoi (late Miocene-Pliocene of Colombia), all based on isolated teeth, are considered as valid species, pending future findings that allow a deeper comparison. This study contributes to the knowledge of the systematics, taxonomy and anatomy of extinct Dinomyidae, which are essential for future studies of the evolutionary history of the group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据