4.6 Article

Alcohol Consumption and Its Influence on the Clinical Picture of Puumala Hantavirus Infection

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14030500

关键词

Puumala hantavirus; hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome; alcohol drinking; ethanol; liver enzymes; pancreatitis; acute kidney injury

类别

资金

  1. Tampere University Hospital
  2. Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere University Hospital [9AA050, 9AB046, 9AA052]
  3. Finnish Foundation for the Promotion of Laboratory Medicine
  4. Finnish Society of Clinical Chemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alcohol consumption does not seem to affect the clinical course and severity of acute PUUV infection.
Puumala hantavirus (PUUV) causes hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Characteristic clinical findings include acute kidney injury (AKI), thrombocytopenia, and capillary leakage. Smoking increases the risk of severe AKI, but it is not known whether alcohol consumption predisposes patients to a more severe infection. Liver and pancreatic enzymes, as well as biomarkers of alcohol consumption (gamma-glutamyl transferase, GGT; carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, CDT; GGT-CDT combination; and ethyl glucuronide, EtG), were measured from 66 patients with acute PUUV infection during hospitalization and at the convalescence phase. Alcohol consumption was present in 41% of the study population, 15% showing signs of heavy drinking. Alcohol use did not affect the severity of PUUV induced AKI nor the overall clinical picture of the infection. Liver enzyme levels (GGT or alanine aminotransferase, ALT) were elevated in 64% of the patients, but the levels did not associate with the markers reflecting the severity of the disease. Serum amylase activities at the convalescent stage were higher than those at the acute phase (p < 0.001). No cases with acute pancreatitis were found. In conclusion, our findings indicate that alcohol consumption does not seem to affect the clinical course of an acute PUUV infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据