4.6 Article

Robust AAV Genotyping Based on Genetic Distances in Rep Gene That Are Maintained by Ubiquitous Recombination

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14051038

关键词

adeno-associated virus; AAV; classification; genotype; serotype; intraspecies; pairwise genetic distance; recombination

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [075-15-2020-899]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are a useful tool for gene therapy delivery. They are currently classified into AAV A and AAV B species within the Dependoparvovirus genus, and further subdivided into 13 serotypes. However, serotype is not a reliable taxonomic category, and the classification needs improvement.
Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are a convenient tool for gene therapy delivery. According to the current classification, they are divided into the species AAV A and AAV B within the genus Dependoparvovirus. Historically AAVs were also subdivided on the intraspecies level into 13 serotypes, which differ in tissue tropism and targeted gene delivery capacity. Serotype, however, is not a universal taxonomic category, and their assignment is not always robust. Cross-reactivity has been shown, indicating that classification could not rely on the results of serological tests alone. Moreover, since the isolation of AAV4, all subsequent AAVs were subdivided into serotypes based primarily on genetic differences and phylogenetic reconstructions. An increased interest in the use of AAV as a gene delivery tool justifies the need to improve the existing classification. Here, we suggest genotype-based AAV classification below the species level based on the rep gene. A robust threshold was established as 10% nt differences within the 1248 nt genome fragment, with 4 distinct AAV genotypes identified. This distinct sub-species structure is maintained by ubiquitous recombination within, but not between, rep genes of the suggested genotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据