4.6 Article

Expression of the Heterotrimeric GP2/GP3/GP4 Spike of an Arterivirus in Mammalian Cells

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14040749

关键词

equine arteritis virus; EAV; multi-cassete expression; mammalian expression; GP2; GP3; GP4; minor proteins; Arterivirus

类别

资金

  1. National Science Center [DEC-2014/12/S/NZ6/00732]
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [VE 141-15]
  3. Wrocaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Equine arteritis virus (EAV) is a significant pathogen of horses, with its glycoproteins GP2, GP3, and GP4 forming a heterotrimer complex responsible for cellular tropism, making it a potential subunit vaccine candidate for horses.
Equine arteritis virus (EAV), an enveloped positive-strand RNA virus, is an important pathogen of horses and the prototype member of the Arteiviridae family. Unlike many other enveloped viruses, which possess homotrimeric spikes, the spike responsible for cellular tropism in Arteriviruses is a heterotrimer composed of 3 glycoproteins: GP2, GP3, and GP4. Together with the hydrophobic protein E they are the minor components of virus particles. We describe the expression of all 3 minor glycoproteins, each equipped with a different tag, from a multi-cassette system in mammalian BHK-21 cells. Coprecipitation studies suggest that a rather small faction of GP2, GP3, and GP4 form dimeric or trimeric complexes. GP2, GP3, and GP4 co-localize with each other and also, albeit weaker, with the E-protein. The co-localization of GP3-HA and GP2-myc was tested with markers for ER, ERGIC, and cis-Golgi. The co-localization of GP3-HA was the same regardless of whether it was expressed alone or as a complex, whereas the transport of GP2-myc to cis-Golgi was higher when this protein was expressed as a complex. The glycosylation pattern was also independent of whether the proteins were expressed alone or together. The recombinant spike might be a tool for basic research but might also be used as a subunit vaccine for horses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据