4.6 Review

Nationwide Hospital-Based Survey of Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma in Japan

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14040791

关键词

adult T-cell leukemia; lymphoma; clinical subtype; prognosis; nationwide survey

类别

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19K08868]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nationwide surveys have played an important role in understanding the pathophysiology and prognosis of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) in Japan. Different surveys have provided information on the classification and prognosis of ATL. Recent surveys have shown an increase in age at onset and a slight improvement in survival rates for certain types of ATL, while little improvement has been observed for others.
Nationwide surveys of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) have played an important role in helping us to understand the pathophysiology of this disease and analyze its prognosis in Japan. Classifications of clinical subtypes have been proposed based on the results of nationwide surveys of patients with ATL diagnosed in the 1980s. This article highlighted the classification and prognosis of ATL based on different surveys and focused on the comparison of data derived from the available surveys. The 11th nationwide hospital-based survey was conducted in patients with ATL diagnosed in 2010-2011 using the same method as that used in the 1980s survey. The median age of disease onset was 68 years, which was increased compared with previous surveys. While median survival of patients with the acute and lymphoma types had not improved much since the 1980s, the 4-year survival rate was higher. Little improvement in the prognosis was observed for the chronic and smoldering types. The 12th nationwide survey of patients with ATL diagnosed in 2012-2013 also showed an increase in age at onset. Further epidemiological research that includes more cases is needed to deepen our understanding of the actual state of treatment and prognosis of this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据