4.6 Article

A Qualitative Risk Assessment for Bluetongue Disease and African Horse Sickness: The Risk of Entry and Exposure at a UK Zoo

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14030502

关键词

bluetongue; African horse sickness; Culicoides; risk assessment; zoo

类别

资金

  1. Defra national Culicoides laboratory [BBS/E/I/00007039, BBS/E/I/00007033, BBS/E/I/00007038]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a qualitative risk assessment to investigate the potential pathways and levels of risk for the introduction of Bluetongue virus and African horse sickness virus to ZSL London Zoo. The findings suggest that ZSL London Zoo is at higher risk of Bluetongue virus release and exposure, compared to African horse sickness virus, which has a lower transmission risk.
Bluetongue virus (BTV) and African horse sickness virus (AHSV) cause economically important diseases that are currently exotic to the United Kingdom (UK), but have significant potential for introduction and onward transmission. Given the susceptibility of animals kept in zoo collections to vector-borne diseases, a qualitative risk assessment for the introduction of BTV and AHSV to ZSL London Zoo was performed. Risk pathways for each virus were identified and assessed using published literature, animal import data and outputs from epidemiological models. Direct imports of infected animals, as well as wind-borne infected Culicoides, were considered as routes of incursion. The proximity of ongoing disease events in mainland Europe and proven capability of transmission to the UK places ZSL London Zoo at higher risk of BTV release and exposure (estimated as low to medium) than AHSV (estimated as very low to low). The recent long-range expansion of AHSV into Thailand from southern Africa highlights the need for vector competence studies of Palearctic Culicoides for AHSV to assess the risk of transmission in this region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据