4.6 Article

Replication Kinetics for a Reporter Merkel Cell Polyomavirus

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14030473

关键词

Merkel cell polyomavirus; minicircle; replication

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA197463, CA170354, T32 AI0602525]
  2. Hillman Postdoctoral Award for Innovative Cancer Research
  3. [P30CA047904]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a new recombinase-mediated MCV minicircle (MCVmc) system that allows for easy genetic manipulation and characterization of viral gene expression kinetics during MCV replication. Our findings reveal that MCV has multiple self-encoded viral restriction mechanisms to promote viral latency over lytic replication.
Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV) causes one of the most aggressive human skin cancers, but laboratory studies on MCV replication have proven technically difficult. We report the first recombinase-mediated MCV minicircle (MCVmc) system that generates high levels of circularized virus, allowing facile MCV genetic manipulation and characterization of viral gene expression kinetics during replication. Mutations to Fbw7, Skp2, beta-TrCP and hVam6p interaction sites, or to the stem loop sequence for the MCV-encoded miRNA precursor, markedly increase viral replication, whereas point mutation to an origin-binding site eliminates active virus replication. To further increase the utility of this system, an mScarlet fusion protein was inserted into the VP1 c-terminus to generate a non-infectious reporter virus for studies on virus kinetics. When this reporter virus genome is heterologously expressed together with MCV VP1 and VP2, virus-like particles are generated. The reporter virus genome is encapsidated and can be used at lower biosafety levels for one-round infection studies. Our findings reveal that MCV has multiple, self-encoded viral restriction mechanisms to promote viral latency over lytic replication, and these mechanisms are now amenable to examination using a recombinase technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据