4.4 Article

Replacement of fangs in a free-ranging desert viperid, Cerastes vipera

期刊

ZOOLOGY
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2022.126013

关键词

Sit-and-wait ambusher; Envenomation apparatus; Rear teeth; Fecal samples; Predator

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed fecal samples of free-ranging Saharan sand vipers and found a high rate of tooth loss and replacement, both in the front fangs and rear teeth. This suggests the importance of both types of teeth in the hunting behavior of free-ranging snakes.
Venomous viperid snakes possess relatively large and fragile hollow fangs that are an integral part of the envenomation apparatus for predation. We hypothesized that fangs serve like disposable needles and predicted a high loss rate and, hence, high replacement rate in free-ranging snakes. Snakes also possess smaller rear teeth that aid in gripping and swallowing the prey. We reasoned that these teeth are less delicate than fangs and predicted that their loss would be at a slower rate than fangs. To test our predictions, we analyzed fecal samples of free-ranging Saharan sand vipers, Cerastes vipera, in the Northern Negev desert, Israel. Close to 25% of fecal samples contained fangs, averaging more than one fang per sample and, consequently, our first prediction was supported. We estimated that fangs are replaced each fourth predation, and that replacement rate under natural conditions is at a high rate of approximately every twenty days. Fecal samples contained rear teeth at the same proportion as fangs, which indicated that the rapid replacement of teeth was not limited only to fangs and, therefore, our second prediction was not supported. These findings reflect the importance of both front fangs and rear teeth in the hunting of prey in free-ranging C. vipera. This is the first quantitative report of fang and rear teeth loss in a free-ranging viperid which is based on their recovery in feces; and we believe that similar high rates of loss occur in other viperid species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据