4.6 Review

Anastomotic occlusion after laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: a rare case study and literature review

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02610-5

关键词

Low anterior rectal resection; Anastomotic occlusion; Therapeutic regime

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anastomotic occlusion after rectal cancer surgery is a rare clinical condition with challenging treatment. This case successfully utilized endoscopic techniques to remove the occlusion, avoiding the need for reoperation or potential pain from a permanent fistula.
Background With the development of laparoscopic techniques and the broad clinical application of various anastomotic types, anal-preserving low anterior rectal resection and ultra-low anterior rectal resection have been popularized. Some patients with rectal cancer have retained their anus and improved their quality of life. Nevertheless, the incidence of postoperative anastomotic stenosis remains high, and anastomotic occlusion is even rarer. Case presentation We report a case of anastomotic occlusion in a patient with rectal cancer, which occurred after undergoing laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection + prophylactic terminal ileal fistulation at our department. Under endoscopy, we used a small guidewire to break through the occluded anastomosis, thereby finding the lacuna. After endoscopic balloon dilation, digital anal dilatation, and continuous dilator-assisted dilation, the desired efficacy was achieved, ultimately recovering ileal stoma. Postoperative follow-up condition was generally acceptable, without symptoms like abdominal pain, bloating, or difficulty in defecation. Conclusion Numerous factors cause postoperative anastomotic stenosis in patients with rectal cancer. Complete occlusion of anastomosis occurs relatively rare in clinical practice, and is challenging to treat. This case was our first attempt to remove the anastomotic occlusion successfully, which avoided re-operation or pain from the permanent fistula.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据