4.7 Article

Chaetoglobosin K induces apoptosis and G2 cell cycle arrest through p53-dependent pathway in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 356, 期 2, 页码 418-433

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.09.023

关键词

Chaetoglobosin K; Ovarian cancer; Apoptosis; Cell cycle arrest; p53; p38

类别

资金

  1. West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission/Division of Science Research
  2. NIH from the National Center for Research Resources [P20RR016477]
  3. National Institute for General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) [P20GM103434, P20GM104931]
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  5. CoBRE [GM102488/RR032138]
  6. ARIA S10 [RR020866]
  7. FORTESSA S10 [OD016165]
  8. INBRE [GM103434]
  9. Office Of The Director
  10. Office of Integrative Activities [1003907] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adverse side effects and acquired resistance to conventional platinum based chemotherapy have become major impediments in ovarian cancer treatment, and drive the development of more selective anticancer drugs. Chaetoglobosin K (ChK) was shown to have a more potent growth inhibitory effect than cisplatin on two cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines, OVCAR-3 and A2780/CP70, and was less cytotoxic to a normal ovarian cell line, IOSE-364, than to the cancer cell lines. Hoechst 33342 staining and Flow cytometry analysis indicated that ChK induced preferential apoptosis and G2 cell cycle arrest in both ovarian cancer cells with respect to the normal ovarian cells. ChK induced apoptosis through a p53-dependent caspase-8 activation extrinsic pathway, and caused G2 cell cycle arrest via cyclin B1 by increasing p53 expression and p38 phosphorylation in OVCAR-3 and A2780/CP70 cells. DR5 and p21 might play an important role in determining the sensitivity of normal and malignant ovarian cells to ChK. Based on these results, ChK would be a potential compound for treating platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据