4.7 Article

Tribological performance of Al2O3-SiO2/PAG composite nanolubricants for application in air-conditioning compressor

期刊

WEAR
卷 492-493, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2022.204238

关键词

Hybrid nanolubricant; Coefficient of friction; Wear rate; Tribology

资金

  1. Universiti Malaysia Pahang [RDU1803169]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proper lubrication using nanoparticles can reduce friction and wear in air-conditioning compressor. The tribological behavior of composite nanolubricants has been improved. It was found that at a volume concentration of 0.02%, the composite nanolubricants showed a reduction of 4.49% in COF and 12.99% in wear rate.
Proper lubrication using nanoparticles helps to reduce friction and wear in air-conditioning compressor. The improvement in tribological behaviour of composite nanolubricants contributes in reduction of the compressor work. Tribological behaviour, such as coefficient of friction (COF) and wear rate performance, were investigated for an automotive air-conditioning (AAC) system compressor using Al2O3-SiO2/PAG composite nanolubricants under reciprocating test conditions to simulate a piston ring or cylinder liner contact. Al2O3 and SiO2 nanoparticles were dispersed in the Polyalkylene Glycol (PAG 46) lubricant using two-steps method of preparation for 0.01%-0.10% volume concentrations. A tribology test rig was used to measure COF and wear rate performance at different loads (2-10 kg) and speeds (200-300 rpm). The highest COF and wear rates reduction of composite nanolubricants was attained up to 4.49% and 12.99% at 0.02% volume concentration, respectively. Meanwhile, the lowest COF and wear rates reduction of 0.01% and 0.26% is reported at 0.01% and 0.06% volume concentration, respectively. No reduction in COF and wear rates occurred for volume concentrations of more than 0.06%. Therefore, it is recommended to use the Al2O3-SiO2/PAG composite nanolubricants with 0.02% volume concentration for application in refrigeration systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据