4.7 Article

Theoretical study on sawing force of ultrasonic vibration assisted diamond wire sawing (UAWS) based on abrasives wear

期刊

WEAR
卷 496, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2022.204291

关键词

Monocrystalline silicon; Ultrasonic vibration assisted; Abrasives wear of wire saw; Sawing force; Surface morphology

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52075127]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper establishes a theoretical model of sawing force assisted by ultrasonic vibration on wire saw, and conducts experimental verification, showing that this method reduces sawing force and improves surface morphology compared to traditional methods.
Wire saw cutting of monocrystalline silicon plays an important role in semiconductor manufacturing. The study of wire saw cutting silicon is important, and the grain wear has a great effect on the saw cutting force. Therefore, in this paper, considering abrasive wear on the wire saw, the ultrasonic vibration assisted sawing force theoretical model from a single abrasive to multiple abrasives is established. With the application of equal probability method, the surface profile model of wire saw is established. According to the abrasive wear law of wire saw, the finite element model (FEM) of wire saw with different abrasive wear is established. The influence of different abrasive wear on sawing force and workpiece surface morphology is analyzed by Abaqus. Finally, the experimental verification is carried out. The experimental results show that the sawing force of the ultrasonic vibration assisted diamond wire sawing (UAWS) decreases by 38% on average than that of the conventional diamond wire sawing (CWS), the surface roughness value is reduced, and the surface morphology is improved. With the increase of the abrasive wear value, the sawing force and the numbers of pits firstly decrease and then increase, the surface roughness value distribution firstly concentrates and then disperses, and the scratches show a smooth to intermittent trend.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据