4.6 Article

Comparison of Microplastic Characteristics in the Indoor and Outdoor Air of Urban Areas of South Korea

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 233, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-022-05650-5

关键词

Microplastics; Indoor and outdoor air; FT-IR; Ventilation

资金

  1. Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) [2020003110008]
  2. Specialized Post Plastics Program of the Graduate School - Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the differences in the quantity, type, size, and shape of microplastics in indoor and outdoor air, revealing that the number of microplastics is higher in indoor environments. The study also found that indoor ventilation volume affects the generation of microplastics, emphasizing the importance of proper ventilation in reducing indoor microplastics.
A diverse range of studies have investigated microplastics in indoor and outdoor air. However, where and how the air was collected differ between studies, as did the methods of separation and analysis. The difference makes it difficult to compare the results of the studies, because the quantity, size, shape, and type of microplastics detected are widely diverse and depend on the detection method. Herein, we studied the number, type, size, and shape of microplastics in air samples collected from the outdoor environment and the indoor environment of buildings with active human activities, such as apartment buildings and offices. The average number of microplastics in the indoor environment was approximately 1.5 times higher than that in the outdoor environment. The indoor ventilation volume affected the amount of microplastics generated, indicating that appropriate ventilation is important for reducing microplastics in indoor environments. This study also sought ways to manage microplastics at their primary sources, which is closely linked with the living environment, by comparing how they are generated in indoor and outdoor environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据