4.5 Article

On the safety threshold of trains running on Sichuan-Tibet Railway bridges under the influence of floating ice

期刊

VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS
卷 61, 期 2, 页码 513-529

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2022.2051566

关键词

Train-track-bridge dynamic interaction; Sichuan-Tibet Railway; floating ice impact; tuned mass damper; safety threshold

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the running safety of trains on the Sichuan-Tibet Railway bridges under floating ice impact loads. A train-track-bridge dynamics model is established and the effect of tuned mass damper (TMD) on train safety under extreme ice loads is analyzed. The results show that the fluid effect significantly influences ice impact loads on the bridge, reducing train speeds and improving safety with the use of TMD.
To investigate the running safety threshold of trains on the Sichuan-Tibet Railway bridges under the floating ice impact loads, a train-track-bridge dynamics model is established based on the theory of the train-track-bridge dynamic interaction and the design method of tuned mass damper (TMD), which uses the fluid-structure coupling method to calculate the floating ice impact loads. Taking a 5 x 32 m typical simply-supported beam bridge on the Sichuan-Tibet Railway as an example, the critical train speeds corresponding to floating ice impact loads of varying intensity are evaluated, and the effect of TMD on the running safety of the trains under extreme ice loads is investigated. The results show that the fluid effect has a significant influence on the impact loads of ice hitting the bridge pier, which cannot be ignored in the calculation. The ice impact intensities significantly reduce the train's safe speeds. Under the action of floating ice impact loads, the TMD attached to the bridge can effectively reduce the train's derailment factor and wheel unloading rate. The greater the TMD mass ratio, the more pronounced the vibration control effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据