4.6 Article

Enhanced resistive switching behavior of CH3NH3PbI3 based resistive random access memory by nickel doping

期刊

VACUUM
卷 198, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110862

关键词

Resistive random access memory; Nickel doping; CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite; Iodine vacancy; Photoresponse

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51971057]
  2. Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC2002075]
  3. Research Funds for the Central University [N2002023, N2102012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, nickel ions are utilized to limit the excessive iodine vacancies in the methylammonium lead halide perovskite film, resulting in improved resistive switching performance. The devices based on the doped film show higher ON/OFF ratio and endurance compared to the devices without doping.
Excessive iodine vacancies (V(I)s) in the methylammonium lead halide perovskites (MAPbI(3)) based resistive random access memories (RRAMs) will cause resistive switching (RS) performance degradation. In this study, nickel ions are utilized to limit the excessive V(I)s in MAPbI(3) film. Based on the analysis of X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, it can be found that the doped nickel ions partially replace lead ions, which can effectively improve lattice integrity and suppress generating of the PbI2 and Pb-0 to limit excessive V(I)s. The RRAM devices based on MAPbI(3) and Ni doped MAPbI(3) films as the resistive switching layer are fabricated in air atmosphere. Compared with the MAPbI(3) device, the Ni doped MAPbI(3) device shows more remarkable RS performance. The ON/OFF ratio and endurance of the Ni doped MAPbI(3) device has reached 10(3) and 300 cycles. Moreover, illumination in the forming stage can further improve the ON/OFF ratio and endurance of the Ni doped MAPbI(3) device to 10(4) and 400 cycles. This work provides a new method for the optimization of organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite RRAM with high ON/OFF ratio and stable endurance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据