4.5 Review

VALUE OF ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT NEOPLASIAS IN THE ADNEXA IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF MALIGNANT OVARIAN TUMOR AND BENIGN OVARIAN TUMOR: A META-ANALYSIS

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Acoustics

External Validation of the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model Performance in Evaluating the Risk of Ovarian Carcinoma Before Surgery in China A Tertiary Center Study

Yixin Zhang et al.

Summary: The study externally validated the good performance of the ADNEX model in a tertiary center in China, showing a good distinction between tumor subtypes. The ADNEX model is a valuable tool in clinical practice and may help in managing patients with adnexal masses.

JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE (2022)

Article Acoustics

Two-Step Strategy for Optimizing the Preoperative Classification of Adnexal Masses in a University Hospital, Using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Models Simple Rules and Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa Model

Alba Liliana Esquivel Villabona et al.

Summary: This study compared the performance of a two-step strategy with the IOTA ADNEX model for preoperative classification of adnexal masses. The results showed that the two-step strategy had similar diagnostic performance to the IOTA ADNEX model, but the latter was more practical and recommended for use due to its simplicity and efficiency.

JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Value of the Ultrasound ADNEX Model for Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors

Xiao-Shan Peng et al.

Summary: The ADNEX model demonstrates good diagnostic performance in distinguishing between benign and malignant ovarian tumors, with an overall accuracy exceeding 80% when CA 125 measurements are included. However, the sensitivity for diagnosing borderline, stage I, and metastatic ovarian tumors is relatively low.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE (2021)

Article Reproductive Biology

Estimating the risk of malignancy of adnexal masses: validation of the ADNEX model in the hands of nonexpert ultrasonographers in a gynaecological oncology centre in China

Ping He et al.

Summary: The study validated the diagnostic accuracy of the IOTA ADNEX model in the preoperative diagnosis of adnexal masses in a gynaecological oncology centre in China. The model showed excellent performance in differentiating benign and malignant adnexal masses, but had difficulty distinguishing between BOT and stage I OC, as well as BOT and ovarian metastases.

JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Sonographic Assessment of Complex Ultrasound Morphology Adnexal Tumors in Pregnant Women with the Use of IOTA Simple Rules Risk and ADNEX Scoring Systems

Artur Czekierdowski et al.

Summary: The study found that subjective assessment is the best predictive method for complex adnexal masses found at prenatal ultrasound in pregnant women. The SRR and ADNEX scoring systems can also be used for tumor characterization, while serum tumor markers CA125 and HE4, along with the ROMA algorithm, appear to be less accurate.

DIAGNOSTICS (2021)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Preoperative Evaluation of the ADNEX Model for the Prediction of the Ovarian Cancer Risk of Adnexal Masses at Siriraj Hospital

Vitcha Poonyakanok et al.

Summary: The ADNEX model demonstrated excellent performance in distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors, with high sensitivity and specificity, and had an optimal cutoff value in the specific population studied.

GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION (2021)

Article Oncology

Ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian mass for predicting malignancy in pregnant women

Se Jin Lee et al.

Summary: The study compared ultrasonographic ovarian mass scoring systems in pregnant women, finding that the Sassone scoring system had the highest accuracy in predicting malignant ovarian tumors.

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Oncology

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Adnexal Masses

Le Qian et al.

Summary: The ADNEX and SRs models showed superior performance in characterizing adnexal masses compared to the RMI model in Chinese patients.

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Assessment of different NEoplasias in the adneXa model for differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses in Korean women

Gina Nam et al.

Summary: The ADNEX model shows excellent discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian tumors in Korean women, with sensitivity and specificity similar to SA, both in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SCIENCE (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Validation of IOTA-ADNEX Model in Discriminating Characteristics of Adnexal Masses: A Comparison with Subjective Assessment

Soo Young Jeong et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (2020)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Validation of models to diagnose ovarian cancer in patients managed surgically or conservatively: multicentre cohort study

Ben Van Calster et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2020)

Review Oncology

Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a review

Brett M. Reid et al.

CANCER BIOLOGY & MEDICINE (2017)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Before surgery predictability of malignant ovarian tumors based on ADNEX model and its use in clinical practice

E. Joyeux et al.

GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE (2016)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Ovarian cancer

Richard Barnett

LANCET (2016)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence

Beatriz Ruiz de Gauna et al.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2015)

Editorial Material Obstetrics & Gynecology

Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum

Jaime Prat

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS (2014)

Article Acoustics

Use of IOTA simple rules for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: meta-analysis

N. Nunes et al.

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY (2014)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

ESSAY Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?

Trisha Greenhalgh et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Penny F. Whiting et al.

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2011)