4.7 Article

Sonoactivated polycrystalline Ni electrodes for alkaline oxygen evolution reaction

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106013

关键词

Electrolysis; Oxygen evolution reaction; Alkaline; Nickel; Ultrasound

资金

  1. NTNU
  2. ENERSENSE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research utilizes ultrasound to activate the surface of metallic nickel, enhancing its activity in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in alkaline media. The sonoactivated Ni exhibits lower potential and charge transfer resistance after ultrasound treatment, which can be attributed to the formation of free OH\dot{\ }} radicals resulting from cavitation bubbles collapsing. However, ultrasound has minimal effects on the electrochemical surface area and Tafel slopes.
The development of cost-effective and active water-splitting electrocatalysts is an essential step toward the realization of sustainable energy. Its success requires an intensive improvement in the kinetics of the anodic half- reaction of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), which determines the overall system efficiency to a large extent. In this work, we designed a facile and one-route strategy to activate the surface of metallic nickel (Ni) for the OER in alkaline media by ultrasound (24 kHz, 44 W, 60% acoustic amplitude, ultrasonic horn). Sonoactivated Ni showed enhanced OER activity with a much lower potential at + 10 mA cm(-2) of + 1.594 V vs. RHE after 30 min ultrasonic treatment compared to + 1.617 V vs. RHE before ultrasonication. In addition, lower charge transfer resistance of 11.1 omega was observed for sonoactivated Ni as compared to 98.5 omega for non-sonoactivated Ni. In our conditions, ultrasound did not greatly affect the electrochemical surface area (A(ecsa)) and Tafel slopes however, the enhancement of OER activity can be due to the formation of free OH center dot & nbsp; radicals resulting from cavitation bubbles collapsing at the electrode/electrolyte interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据