4.5 Article

Simulating the Misting of Lubricant in the Piston Assembly of an Automotive Gasoline Engine: The Effect of Viscosity Modifiers and Other Key Lubricant Components

期刊

TRIBOLOGY LETTERS
卷 70, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-022-01589-0

关键词

Crankcase lubricant; Droplet formation; Misting; Lubricant additives; Viscosity modifiers; Viscosity index improvers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of lubricant droplets in the gas flow of an internal combustion engine has significant implications for performance, including lubricant supply, oil consumption, and lubricant degradation. The viscosity of the lubricant and the presence of viscosity modifiers have been found to play a crucial role in the formation of droplets.
The presence of lubricant droplets in the gas that flows through the piston assembly and crankcase of an internal combustion engine (generically termed oil misting) has important implications for performance, particularly lubricant supply to the upper piston assembly, oil consumption and lubricant degradation. A significant source of these droplets is thought to be oil shearing and blow-through by blow-by gas flows in the piston assembly. An experimental rig was developed to simulate the high velocity gas and lubricant film interactions at a top piston ring gap where the flow conditions are most severe. Flows of lubricant droplets were produced and characterised in terms of the proportion of the oil flow that formed droplets in the gas flow and the size distribution of the droplets produced. Considering various aspects of a commercial automotive crankcase formulation, the effect of lubricant viscosity was found to be particularly important. Of the lubricant additives evaluated, viscosity modifiers were found to have the greatest effect on the tendency to form droplets: Detailed study on a range of viscosity modifiers identified that the influence of their molecular architectures on viscoelasticity was the key mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据