4.7 Article

Optimal E-tailing channel structure and service contracting in the platform era

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102614

关键词

Supply chain management; E-platforms; Service contract; Channel structure; Coordination

资金

  1. Yushan Fellow Program [NTU-110VV012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the optimal channel selection and e-platform service contracting problem for e-tailers. Analytical models are built to derive the optimal e-platform service contract and determine the conditions for the e-tailer's optimal channel selection choice. Extensions to the basic models confirm the validity of the findings, while also revealing limitations of the revenue-sharing plus fixed fee (RSF) service contract.
Today, many e-tailers sell through e-platforms. Some of them sell products through both their own direct-online (DO) sales channel and e-platforms, while some give up their own DO sales channel and sell solely through e-platforms. Motivated by the popularity of e-platforms, we explore in this paper the optimal channel selection and e-platform service contracting problem. We build analytical models to explore when an e-tailer should choose which channel structure. Based on the commonly-observed industrial practices, in the basic models, we derive the optimal e-platform service contract which is a revenue-sharing plus fixed fee (RSF) service contract. We establish the conditions under which the e-tailer's optimal channel selection choice will also be optimal for the e-platform systems. To test robustness of the research findings, three extensions are examined. For the extended model with a separate manufacturer, as well as the extended analysis with a social welfare optimization objective, we reveal that all the findings in the basic models remain valid. However, when the e-tailer decides both product pricing and quality, we uncover that the RSF service contract fails to achieve robust systems optimization. We hence show how the use of a cost-sharing RSF service contract can help.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据