4.7 Review

Overview on microfluidics devices for monitoring brain disorder biomarkers

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116693

关键词

Neurological disorder; Microfluidic device; Biomarker detection; Analytical methods; Organ-on-a-chip

资金

  1. National Fund for Scientific Research
  2. Walloon Region of Belgium
  3. EU
  4. FNRS through Chimic EOS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurological disorders are a major cause of disability and death worldwide. Recent advances in microfluidic devices and human organ-on-a-chip systems have provided new opportunities to study and monitor these diseases. By combining with biosensors, mass spectrometry or automatic imaging systems, researchers have used microfluidic technology to achieve personalized medicine.
Neurological disorders are one of the leading causes of disability and death worldwide. The complexity of the human brain and therefore the significant structural gap between animal models and humans, all serve to hinder translational success. Recent advances in microfluidic devices and human organ-on-a chip systems have provided new opportunities to study and monitor such diseases with the benefits of precise control, lower sample requirement and reagent consumption, cost-effectiveness and high throughput screening. Combined with biosensors, mass spectrometry or automatic imaging systems, they have emerged as a unique way to facilitate personalized medicine. To obtain relevant and reliable information, it is crucial to address the different challenges specific to each type of microfluidics device. In the following review, the discussion is focused on the technical setup of microfluidic devices for the detection of brain disorder biomarkers and on the microfluidics strategies that are applied to monitor neurological diseases. In the last section, we also discuss limitations, challenges and regulatory requirements that remain to be considered in future experiments.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据