4.7 Review

The ten principles of green sample preparation

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116530

关键词

Green sample preparation; Green analytical chemistry; Miniaturization; Sustainable development; Automation; Green solvents

资金

  1. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA 16215]
  2. IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry) [2021-015-2-500]
  3. Division of Analytical Chemistry of the European Chemical Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ten principles of GSP aim to establish a roadmap for the development of overall greener analytical methodologies by promoting the use of safe solvents/reagents and renewable materials, reducing waste and energy demand, enabling higher sample throughput, procedure simplification/automation, and improving operator safety.
The ten principles of GSP are presented with the aim of establishing a road map toward the development of overall greener analytical methodologies. Paramount aspects for greening sample preparation and their interconnections are identified and discussed. These include the use of safe solvents/reagents and materials that are renewable, recycled and reusable, minimizing waste generation and energy demand, and enabling high sample throughput, miniaturization, procedure simplification/automation, and operator's safety. Further, the importance of applying green metrics for assessing the greenness of sample preparation methods is highlighted, next to the contribution of GSP in achieving the broader goal of sustainability. Green sample preparation is sample preparation. It is not a new subdiscipline of sample preparation but a guiding principle that promotes sustainable development through the adoption of environmentally benign sample preparation procedures. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据