4.7 Review

Current state of supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116544

关键词

Supercritical fluid chromatography; Mass spectrometry; SFC-MS interfaces; Matrix effects; Mass analyzers

资金

  1. STARSS project [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000465]
  2. ERDF
  3. Project of the Czech Science Foundation [21-27270S]
  4. Project of Specific Research [SVV 260548]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry (SFC-MS) is a commonly used analytical method that has wide applicability in various fields. However, there are challenges and principles in selecting suitable interfaces and mass analyzers. Additionally, differences arise when using SFC-MS compared to liquid chromatography with atmospheric pressure ionization sources.
Similarly to other hyphenated techniques, supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) highly benefits from the coupling with mass spectrometry (MS) detection as evident from the increasing number of published SFC-MS methods. SFC-MS is nowadays routinely used in numerous application fields and experimentally investigated in many others. The selection of mass analyzers in SFC relies on the same principles as in both liquid and gas chromatography. The overview of published studies revealed that more than 70% of the SFC-MS analyzes are carried out using electrospray ionization, while atmospheric pressure photo ionization remains largely neglected. This review aims to describe challenges and principles of the selections of suitable interface considering used ion source and chromatographic conditions. Moreover, differences arising from using SFC contrary to liquid chromatography with atmospheric pressure ionization sources are described. Matrix effect issues in SFC-MS are summarized here as well as the overall applicability across analytical fields.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据