Predicting ductile fracture during biaxial sheet stretching using an ellipsoidal void model

Ductile fracture during biaxial sheet stretching for two types of ferrous alloys and one type of nonferrous pure metal was predicted using the ellipsoidal void model proposed by one of the authors. First, fracture forming limit obtained experimentally by the Nakajima test scarcely differed from that obtained experimentally by the Marciniak test. Next, fracture forming limit obtained by the experiment scarcely depended on the magnitude of prestrain, which was applied to the sheet by rolling, and scarcely depended on the type of prestrain. Since the number of material constants on ductile fracture is only one, the material constant was determined so that the material thickness at fracture calculated from the simulation agreed with that obtained by the experiment. Fracture forming limit calculated using the ellipsoidal void model agreed closely with that obtained by the experiment, whereas fracture forming limit calculated using conventional ductile fracture criteria differed from that obtained by the experiment. Furthermore, fracture forming limit calculated using the ellipsoidal void model and that calculated using the conventional ductile fracture criteria changed drastically when the strain ratio changed across one for simulating biaxial stretching using a prestrained sheet.

Automated summary

The study predicted ductile fracture during biaxial sheet stretching for two types of ferrous alloys and one type of nonferrous pure metal using the ellipsoidal void model. Experimental results showed that the fracture forming limit was not significantly affected by different magnitudes and types of prestrain. The calculated fracture forming limit using the ellipsoidal void model closely matched the experimental results, while the traditional ductile fracture criteria showed differences.