4.5 Article

Design of a multi-sensor information acquisition system for mannequin reconstruction and human body size measurement under clothes

期刊

TEXTILE RESEARCH JOURNAL
卷 92, 期 19-20, 页码 3750-3765

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/00405175221093663

关键词

Anthropometric data acquisition; mannequin reconstruction; mesh deformation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a method for 3D mannequin reconstruction and human body size measurement based on information fusion of multiple sensors. The system developed can acquire key size data of the human body under clothes and has been proven to be accurate through reconstruction experiments.
Although the measurement of human sizes and the reconstruction of mannequins have been extensively studied, there has been little research on systems applicable for measurement and reconstruction under clothes. This work presents a method for three-dimensional (3D) mannequin reconstruction and human body size measurement based on information fusion of multiple sensors. For this purpose, a multi-sensor information acquisition system (MIAS) is developed allowing one to acquire 11 key size data of the human body under clothes. The MIAS is based on the proposed parametric mannequin method and the Laplace mesh deformation technique, thus allowing one to reconstruct the mannequin conforming to the MIAS measurements. All mannequins reconstructed by this method have the same topology, which will greatly facilitate subsequent processing, such as garment design, customization and virtual fitting. The results of the reconstruction experiments show that our system can reconstruct a mannequin that matches the size of the feature parts very well. In addition, performed comparison experiments with manual and laser measurements shows that the measurement results of our system are close to those of manual and laser measurements. This provides a viable method for measuring key body sizes under clothes and reconstructing the corresponding 3D mannequin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据