4.7 Article

Detection and discrimination of antibiotics in food samples using a microfluidic paper-based optical tongue

期刊

TALANTA
卷 241, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123242

关键词

Antibiotic; Electronic nose; Metallochromic complex; Paper-based microfluidic; Sensor array

资金

  1. Shiraz University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the development of a microfluidic paper-based analytical device for detection of antibiotic residues in milk and eggs. The device is low-cost, simple, and provides accurate discrimination of different antibiotics at very low concentrations.
Antibiotics are used largely in agriculture and animal farming. As a result, antibiotic residues are found in food products as well as pharmaceutical industries and farming wastes. Since consumption of food products contaminated with antibiotic in excessive residuals causes severe environmental risks, our study here aims to detect the residues level of selected antibiotics in milk and egg. For monitoring of the antibiotic residues in various food diaries, low-cost, simple and rapid methods are required. This paper reports fabricating a disposable microfluidic paper-based analytical device for detection and discrimination of 8 antibiotics. This small but efficient device works based on combination of paper microfluidics, sensor array concept (an array of metallochromic complexes, which provides an optical tongue, and chemometrics data analysis. The discrimination is based on differential interaction of the antibiotics with 5 metal-indicator complexes and displacing the chromogenic indicators. This resulted in specific color changes for each antibiotic. The discriminant models obtained by employing linear discriminant analysis could discriminate antibiotics in real samples of milk and egg white and yolk at concentrations of as low as 5.0 mg L-1 with 100% accuracy. Also, semi-quantitative analysis was provided to detect trace amounts of the antibiotics (1.0 mg L-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据