4.1 Article

Field comparison of the total station-based QDaedalus and the zenith telescope-based CODIAC astrogeodetic systems for measurements of the deflection of the vertical

期刊

SURVEY REVIEW
卷 55, 期 390, 页码 247-259

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00396265.2022.2054108

关键词

Deflections of the Vertical; Astrogeodetic Observations; Astrogeodetic Measurement Systems; QDaedalus; CODIAC; Digital Zenith Camera System (DZCS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study determines the precision and accuracy of the QDaedalus system based on observations at two locations in Switzerland. The precision was found to be 0.1'' through extensive observations, while the accuracy was established through parallel observations and found to be within 0.1''. Notably, a large systematic trend was observed in the N-S DoV data at one of the test stations.
The precision and accuracy of a Leica MultiStation 60-based QDaedalus astrogeodetic measurement system are determined through observations at two locations in Switzerland. The precision of the QDaedalus was determined as 0.1 '' for the N-S and E-W deflections of the verticals (DoVs) through 118 series of observations collected over 13 nights (in a 44-day observation period) at the HEIG-VD test station. The accuracy of the QDaedalus system was established by simultaneous parallel observations over two nights using the CODIAC system at the Zimmerwald Observatory. The differences between them were found to be 0.09 '' and 0.02 '' for the N-S and E-W DoV components, respectively. From these results, the accuracies of both DoV components can be interpreted as 0.1 ''. We also found a large systematic trend in the observed N-S DoV data at the HEIG-VD test station (0.008 ''/day). This study is the most extensive thus far for determining the precision and accuracy of the QDaedalus system for astrogeodetic measurements; it is also the first time that QDaedalus system's accuracy has been established using parallel observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据