4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Demystifying the outcome disparities in carotid revascularization: Utilization of experienced centers

期刊

SURGERY
卷 172, 期 2, 页码 766-771

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.03.043

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Dean's Leadership in Health and Science Scholarship at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that patients of color and those with Medicaid or lack of insurance had lower rates of utilizing high-volume centers for carotid revascularization. Further systemic efforts to ensure equitable access to experienced centers may reduce observed disparities in carotid revascularization.
Background: The present study examined race- and insurance-based disparities in utilization of high-volume centers for carotid revascularization. Methods: Adults (>= 18 years) undergoing carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting were identified in the 2012-2019 National Inpatient Sample. Annual, institutional volume of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting were tabulated, and hospitals in the highest and lowest quartiles were considered high-volume centers and low-volume centers, respectively. Multivariable logistic models were developed to evaluate the association of race and insurance status with high-volume center utilization. Logistic and linear regression was used to examine the association of high-volume centers with outcomes of interest. Results: Of an estimated 583,200 eligible patients, 60.3% underwent carotid revascularization at high-volume centers. Treatment at high-volume centers was associated with improved outcomes, including decreased odds of mortality/stroke/myocardial infarction (adjusted odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.96) and a decrement in length of stay (beta: -0.19, 95% confidence interval: -0.25 to 0.12) and hospitalization costs by $2,000 (95% confidence interval: 1,800-2,300). After adjustment, Black (adjusted odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.55), Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.55), and other non-White patients (adjusted odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.52) had lower odds of undergoing carotid revascularization at high-volume centers compared to White patients. Similarly, Medicaid (adjusted odds ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.80-0.94) and lack of insurance (adjusted odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.92) were associated with lower odds of high-volume center utilization relative to private insurance. Conclusion: Patients of color and those with Medicaid or lack of insurance used high-volume centers at lower rates. Further systemic efforts to ensure equitable access to experienced centers may reduce observed disparities in carotid revascularization. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据