4.7 Article

Corrosion resistance of MoS2-modified titanium alloy micro-arc oxidation coating

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 433, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128127

关键词

Micro-arc oxidation; Ti-6Al-4V alloy; MoS2; Electrochemical corrosion; Galvanic corrosion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774249]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (Southwest Petroleum University) [PLN2021-22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of MoS2 particles in the micro-arc oxidation treatment significantly improves the corrosion resistance of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy, forming a composite oxide coating with different MoS2 contents. The addition of MoS2 can effectively block the micropores of the coating, resulting in higher resistance and lower corrosion rate.
To improve the corrosion resistance of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy treated by micro-arc oxidation (MAO), molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) particles were added into the electrolyte and a composite oxide coating was formed with different MoS2 contents on the surface of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. A scanning electron microscope and a handheld roughness meter were used to analyze the surface morphology and roughness of the coating, and the corrosion performance of the MAO-treated Ti-6Al-4V alloy was analyzed by galvanic corrosion meter and electrochemical workstation. The results show that MoS2 can be successfully incorperated into the coating and block the micropores during the process of micro-arc oxidation. Electrochemical experiments showed that the coating has a higher resistance and a lower corrosion rate, while in the galvanic experiment, the galvanic potential and galvanic current of the coating also decreased. Under the experimental conditions, the addition of MoS2 can significantly improve the corrosion resistance of the MAO coating, and the best corrosion resistance is obtained when the addition amount is 4g/L, this will expand the marine applications of Ti-6Al-4V alloy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据