4.7 Article

Mechanical and tribological properties of Ti-Al-Ta-N/TiAl and Ti-Al-Ta-N/Ta multilayer coatings deposited by DC magnetron sputtering

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 441, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128582

关键词

Ti-Al-Ta-N coating; Multilayer architecture; Microstructure; Mechanical properties; Scratch test; Wear performance

资金

  1. [FWRW-2021-0010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanical properties, adhesion, and wear resistance of Ti0.41Al0.48Ta0.11N monolithic coating and Ti0.41Al0.48Ta0.11N/Ti0.45Al0.55 and Ti0.41Al0.48Ta0.11N/Ta multilayers were investigated. The multilayer coatings showed lower mechanical properties but stronger adhesion and improved wear resistance.
The mechanical properties, microstructure, adhesion and wear behavior of a Ti0.41Al0.48Ta0.11N monolithic coating and Ti0.41Al0.48Ta0.11N/Ti0.45Al0.55 and Ti0.41Al0.48Ta0.11N/Ta multilayers were investigated. The coatings were deposited on titanium substrates by reactive DC magnetron co-sputtering. The hardness and reduced elastic modulus of the coatings were determined by nanoindentation. The multilayer coatings were found to exhibit the lower mechanical characteristics than those of the monolithic coating due to the contribution of the softer metal interlayers to their measured values. Adhesion evaluation was performed by scratch testing. The Ti0.41Al0.48Ta0.11N/Ti0.45Al0.55 multilayer was characterized by stronger adhesion to the titanium substrate than the monolithic coating, whereas the Ti0.41Al0.48Ta0.11N/Ta multilayer exhibited poorer adhesion. In contrast, both the multilayers showed improved wear resistance compared with the monolithic coating. The best wear performance was demonstrated by the Ti0.41Al0.48Ta0.11N/Ti0.45Al0.55 multilayer that was attributed to stronger bonding between the layers as well as the lower hardness of the Ti0.45Al0.55 layers, which allowed for the accommodation of a larger amount of deformation via their plastic flow.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据