4.7 Article

Duplex treatment of arc plasma nitriding and PVD TiN coating applied to dental implant screws

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 439, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128449

关键词

Dental implant; Duplex treatment; Arc plasma nitriding; PVD TiN coating; Screw loosening; Fatigue

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775096]
  2. Central University Basic Research Fund of China [N2003009]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences-WEGO Research Devel-opment Plan [[2007] 006]
  4. Tribology Science Fund of State Key Labo-ratory of Tribology [SKLTKF21B03]
  5. Science Fund of Key Laboratory for Precision and Non-Traditional Machining Technology of Ministry of Education [B202101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effects of duplex treatment of arc plasma nitriding and TiN coating on the mechanical behavior of implant systems, showing that this treatment can improve the anti-loosening performance of screws, reduce surface wear, and prolong fatigue life.
In modern dentistry, surface modification technology is critical for the long-term service of dental implants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the duplex treatment of arc plasma nitriding and TiN coating on the mechanical behavior of implant systems. The Ti6Al4V screws of dental implants were treated by physical vapor deposition (PVD), arc plasma nitriding (APN), and arc plasma nitriding-physical vapor deposition (APNPVD). The surface characteristics, loosening properties, and fatigue performance of different treated screws were analyzed. The results showed that APN-PVD duplex treatment produced a gradient surface structure, reduced the surface roughness, and improved the TiN coating adhesion. Compared with the PVD-treated screws alone, APNPVD-treated screws improved anti-loosening performance, reduced surface wear, and prolonged fatigue life. Duplex treatment by arc plasma nitriding and TiN coating may be a method suitable for dental applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据