4.7 Article

A novel spectral coherence-based envelope spectrum for railway axle-box bearing damage identification

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14759217221095067

关键词

Damage identification; fault detection; weighted combined envelope spectrum; spectral coherence; railway bearing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a weighted combined envelope spectrum (WCES) based on spectral coherence for bearing damage detection. By introducing frequency domain signal-to-noise ratio and a weighting function, this method can effectively reveal and extract bearing damage information.
Damage identification of axle-box bearings is essential to ensure the safe operation of railway trains. The envelope spectrums generated by spectral coherence are effective bearing damage identification tools, but the traditional spectral coherence-based envelope spectrums cannot effectively reveal the bearing damage features under strong interference noise or cannot fully extract the damage information distributed in multiple spectral frequency bands. To solve these problems, a weighted combined envelope spectrum (WCES) based on spectral coherence is proposed as an enhanced bearing damage detector in this paper. First, the frequency domain signal-to-noise ratio (FDSNR) is devised to measure the damage information in each spectral frequency component of spectral coherence. Then, an information threshold is introduced into the estimated FDSNR to construct a weighting function to enhance the informative spectral frequency components and eliminate the interference components. Eventually, the spectral coherence normalized by the weighting function is integrated to generate WCES for bearing damage identification. The simulation and experimental results indicate that the proposed method can effectively excavate the fault-related information and detect railway axle-box bearing damages, and the comparisons with the state-of-the-art methods demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据