4.7 Article

Effect of Hypertension on Efficacy and Safety o Ticagrelor-Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel-Aspirin in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

期刊

STROKE
卷 53, 期 9, 页码 2799-2808

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038662

关键词

Clopidogrel; hypertension; minor stroke; ticagrelor; transient ischemic attac

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (MOST)
  2. Chinese Stroke Association (CSA)
  3. Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission
  4. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017ZX09304018]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81870905, U20A20358]
  6. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program [PX2020021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin in stroke patients with different hypertension statuses. Patients without hypertension showed a significant benefit from ticagrelor-aspirin compared to those with previously diagnosed hypertension. The risk of bleeding with ticagrelor-aspirin was not influenced by hypertension status.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a risk factor of poor stroke outcomes and associated with antiplatelet resistance. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin in patients with different hypertension status, using randomized trial data from the CHANCE-2 trial (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II). METHODS: A total of 6412 patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles were enrolled and randomized to either ticagrelor-aspirin or clopidogrel-aspirin group. Hypertension status were classified into no, newly diagnosed, and previously diagnosed hypertension according to medical history, blood pressure, and antihypertensive medications during hospitalization. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were stroke recurrence and moderate to severe bleeding risk within 90-day follow-up. RESULTS: Ticagrelor-aspirin was associated with reduced risk of new stroke in patients without hypertension (32 [4.8%] versus 60 [7.2%]; hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35-0.86]), but not in those with a newly diagnosed hypertension (20 [5.3%] versus 36 [9.1%]; hazard ratio 0.59 [95% CI, 0.33-1.07]), or those with a previously diagnosed hypertension (139 [7.0%] versus 147 [7.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.74-1.18]) compared with clopidogrel-aspirin (P=0.04 for interaction). The risk of bleeding for ticagrelor-aspirin was not associated with hypertension status (0.1% versus 0.4%; 0.3% versus 0.5%, 0.4% versus 0.3%, P=0.50 for interaction). All the efficacy and safety outcomes between treatments did not differ by blood pressure levels on admission. CONCLUSIONS: In the CHANCE-2 trial, patients without hypertension received a significantly greater benefit from ticagrelor- aspirin than those with previous hypertension after minor stroke or transient ischemic attack, and a similar benefit trend was observed in those with newly diagnosed hypertension. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据