4.4 Article

The Polar Cap (PC) Index: PCS Version Based on Dome-C Data

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021SW002941

关键词

solar wind magnetosphere interaction; polar cap geomagnetic variations; polar cap index; space weather; geomagnetic storms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces different versions of the standard polar cap (PC) indices, as well as derivation procedures developed to generate alternative PCS index values based on Dome Concordia (Dome-C) data. The assessments of the new PCS index have shown its unprecedented high relevance. Some methods used in this study deviate from the corresponding features considered inadequate by the International Association for Geomagnetism and Aeronomy-endorsed PC index derivation methods.
The standard polar cap (PC) indices, PCN (North) based on magnetic data from Qaanaaq in Greenland and PCS (South) based on data from Vostok in Antarctica, have been submitted from the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute in St. Petersburg, Russia, the Danish Meteorological Institute, and the Danish Space Research Institute in different versions. In order to consolidate PCS indices based on Vostok data or replace poor or missing index data, derivation procedures have been developed to generate alternative PCS index values based on data from Dome Concordia (Dome-C) magnetic observations from epoch 2009-2020 of solar cycle 24. The reference levels and calibration parameters needed for calculations of Dome-C-based PCS values in post-event and real-time versions are defined and explained in the present work. Assessments of the new PCS index have shown its unprecedented high relevance. Part of the methods used here, such as the quiet reference level construction and the correlation and regression procedures used for calculations of scaling parameters, deviate from corresponding features considered inadequate of the International Association for Geomagnetism and Aeronomy-endorsed PC index derivation methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据