4.3 Article

Lidar observations of long-range transported Saharan dust over Sofia, Bulgaria: a case study of dust mixed with local aerosols

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.10.036009

关键词

atmospheric aerosols; desert mineral dust; long-range transport; two-wavelength lidar; dust/aerosol backscatter; microphysics and dynamics; backscatter-related Angstrom exponent profiling and distributions

资金

  1. European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [654169]
  2. 7th Framework Programme (FP7) [262254]
  3. Bulgarian Science Fund [D01-194/2014, DFNI-E 01/2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-wavelength (1064/532 nm) lidar observations of long-range transported Saharan dust present in the atmosphere over Sofia, Bulgaria, during a 4-day dust intrusion event in winter 2010, are reported. Aged desert aerosols are detected at altitudes up to 4 km above the sea level, within and above the boundary layer as mixed with other aerosols-representing the particular case under consideration. Optical, microphysical, and dynamical properties of dust aerosols are obtained and analyzed. Special attention is paid to retrieving and vertical profiling of dust backscatter-related Antrom exponents(BAEs), as well as to determining their frequency-count distributions. Obtained BAE values in the range 0.3 to 0.6 (+/- 0.2) indicate domination of coarse particles in the near overmicron size range. Reasonability of coarse-mode-dominated dust size composition is substantiated, based on measurement and transportation-history analysis. The performed frequency-count statistics reveals dust BAE distributions asymmetrically extended to multimode distribution shapes, resulting from dust mixing with finer local aerosol fractions. Peculiarities and patterns of the aerosol dynamics at different stages of dust-loading event are revealed and discussed. (C) 2016 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据