4.5 Article

Enhanced photocatalytic activity with metal ion doping and co-doping in CeO2 nanoparticles

期刊

SOLID STATE SCIENCES
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2022.106846

关键词

Photocatalysis; Doping; Co-doping; Crystal violet; Thioglycerol

资金

  1. TIET, Patiala

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of yttrium (Y) and zinc (Zn) doping and co-doping on the structural and optical properties of CeO2 for photocatalytic activity. The results show that metal ion co-doping significantly enhances the degradation efficiency.
In the present work effect of Yttrium (Y) and Zinc (Zn) doping and co-doping on the structural and optical properties of CeO2 are studied to evaluate its photocatalytic activity for the removal of crystal violet dye. A series of Y (2-10 mol %) and Zn (2-10 mol %) doped CeO2 are synthesized via co-precipitation route. The synthesized samples were characterized via X-ray diffraction, Transmission electron microscopy, Energy Dispersive X-ray analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. The presence of different functional groups are studied via FTIR and Raman spectroscopy. XRD results confirmed the formation of cubic fluorite structured CeO2 with average crystallite size ~ 3-7 nm. Y doping in CeO2 resulted an increase in the crystallite size, whereas Zn led to decrease in the crystallite size. The photocatalytic activity is studied via UV-visible spectroscopy technique by examining the absorbance spectra. Among the various samples, 8 mol % Y-doped CeO2 exhibited 100% degradation efficiency within 7 h, while 8% Zn-doped CeO2 exhibited 100% degradation efficiency towards crystal violet (CV) dye within 5 h under UV-visible illumination. In case of Y, Zn co-doped CeO2 samples, 100% degradation efficiency towards CV dye was achieved within 3 h under UV-visible light. The present study shows that the metal ion co-doping can lead to enhancement in the degradation efficiency by several folds as compared to doped samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据