4.6 Article

Generalized hesitant fuzzy numbers and their application in solving MADM problems based on TOPSIS method

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 26, 期 10, 页码 4673-4683

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-022-06995-z

关键词

Generalized hesitant fuzzy numbers; Distance measures; Hesitant fuzzy numbers; Hesitant fuzzy sets; Multi-attribute decision making problems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Generalized hesitant fuzzy numbers (GHFNs) are used to handle situations where there is a finite set of known values and a finite set of degrees of doubt. This paper applies GHFNs to model the uncertainty in assessing options against criteria in multi-attribute decision making problems. The TOPSIS method is updated to work with GHFNs by defining distances between GHFNs and proposing a new TOPSIS method based on GHFNs.
Generalized hesitant fuzzy numbers (GHFNs) are able to directly manage situations in which we may encounter a finite set of known values with a finite set of degrees of doubt as quantitative approximations of an uncertain situation/quantification of a linguistic expression. They are new extensions of hesitant fuzzy sets, which have been considered in this paper. In fact, in this paper, GHFNs will be utilized to model the uncertainty of the assessment values of options against criteria in multi-attribute decision making (MADM) problems. It means that all of the elements of decision matrix are GHFNs. Then, the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method, as a very successful method in solving MADM problems, will be updated to be used with GHFNs. To this end, the distance between GHFNs must be defined to obtain the distances between given alternatives from each of two subjective alternatives (positive/negative ideal solutions). Thus, three existing famous distance measures, i.e., general distance (d(g)), Hamming distance (d(h)), and Euclidean distance (d(e)) measures, have been updated for GHFNs firstly. Then, the new TOPSIS method will be proposed based on GHFNs. Finally, the numerical examples have been appointed to illustrate the proposed method, analyze comparatively and validate it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据