4.6 Article

Fusion of modern meta-heuristic optimization methods using arithmetic optimization algorithm for global optimization tasks

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 26, 期 14, 页码 6749-6763

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-022-07079-8

关键词

Arithmetic optimization algorithm; Grasshopper optimization algorithm; Metaheuristic; Optimization methods

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University Researchers Supporting Project [TURSP-2020/300]
  2. Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes a fusion method for global optimization tasks that can be applied to different problems. Through thorough testing and analysis, it is shown to have efficient performance.
Several population-based techniques have subsequently been proposed. Despite their broad use in a variety of applications, we are still investigating the use of proposed methods to tackle real-world challenges. As a result, researchers must considerably modify and enhance their approaches based on the primary evolutionary processes in order to achieve rapid convergence, consistent equilibrium with high-quality data, and optimization. The paper proposes a fusion method (AOA-GOA) meta-heuristic optimization methods for global optimization tasks. They can be applied to different problems, including image processing, machine learning, wireless networks, power systems, engineering design, etc. The method fusion proposed is analyzed in context with GOA and AOA. To evaluate the performance, each method is tested on the same parameters like population size and number of iteration. The proposed IAOA is evaluated by varying the dimensions. The impact of varying dimensions is a standard test used in previous studies for optimizing test functions that show the effect of varying dimensions on efficiency of IAOA. From this, it is noted that it works efficiently for both high and low dimensional problems. In high dimensional problem, the proposed method gives efficient search results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据