相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Mobilising the Next Generation of Stated-Preference Studies: the Association of Access Device with Choice Behaviour and Data Quality
Caroline M. Vass et al.
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2021)
Understanding Respondents' Attitudes Toward Web Paradata Use
Tanja Kunz et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2020)
Chronotype assessment via a large scale socio-demographic survey favours yearlong Standard time over Daylight Saving Time in central Europe
Martin Sladek et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2020)
Switching away: Exploring on-device media multitasking in web surveys
Jan Karem Hoehne et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2020)
A Typology of Web Survey Paradata for Assessing Total Survey Error
Colleen A. McClain et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2019)
Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider
Danny Campbell et al.
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2019)
The link between response time and preference, variance and processing heterogeneity in stated choice experiments
Danny Campbell et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (2018)
Why Do Web Surveys Take Longer on Smartphones?
Mick P. Couper et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2017)
Investigating Cognitive Effort and Response Quality of Question Formats in Web Surveys Using Paradata
Jan Karem Hoehne et al.
FIELD METHODS (2017)
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies
Robert J. Johnston et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS (2017)
Response time in online stated choice experiments: the non-triviality of identifying fast and slow respondents
Danny Campbell et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY (2017)
How, when and why integrated choice and latent variable models are latently useful
Akshay Vij et al.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL (2016)
Laypersons' digital problem solving: Relationships between strategy and performance in a large-scale international survey
Zsofia Voros et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2016)
Are Fast Responses More Random? Testing the Effect of Response Time on Scale in an Online Choice Experiment
Tobias Borger
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2016)
Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach
Andrew Westbrook et al.
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE (2015)
Explaining Interview Duration in Web Surveys: A Multilevel Approach
Tobias Gummer et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2015)
Experimental Design Criteria and Their Behavioural Efficiency: An Evaluation in the Field
Richard T. Yao et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2015)
Does the use of mobile devices (tablets and smartphones) affect survey quality and choice behaviour in web surveys?
Ulf Liebe et al.
JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING (2015)
EXPLORING THE EFFECTS OF REMOVING TOO FAST RESPONSES AND RESPONDENTS FROM WEB SURVEYS
Robert Greszki et al.
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY (2015)
Comparison of Smartphone and Online Computer Survey Administration
Tom Wells et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2014)
On the (im-)possibility of deriving transport policy implications from hybrid choice models
Caspar G. Chorus et al.
TRANSPORT POLICY (2014)
Linking response quality to survey engagement: A combined random scale and latent variable approach
Stephane Hess et al.
JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING (2013)
Giving Stated Preference Respondents Time to Think: Results From Four Countries
Joseph Cook et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2012)
Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies
Brett Day et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (2012)
Exploring Scale Effects of Best/Worst Rank Ordered Choice Data to Estimate Benefits of Tourism in Alpine Grazing Commons
Riccardo Scarpa et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2011)
A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors
Anthony Scott et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2011)
Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation?
Henrik Lindhjem et al.
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS (2011)
DOES THE NUMBER OF CHOICE SETS MATTER? RESULTS FROM A WEB SURVEY APPLYING A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
Mickael Bech et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2011)
Non-trading, lexicographic and inconsistent behaviour in stated choice data
Stephane Hess et al.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT (2010)
Cognitive Burden of Survey Questions and Response Times: A Psycholinguistic Experiment
Timo Lenzner et al.
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2010)
Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review
Weimiao Fan et al.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2010)
Respondents' ignoring of attribute information in a choice modelling survey
William Henry Kaye-Blake et al.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2009)
If You Provide It, Will They Read It ? Response Time Effects in a Choice Experiment
Arvin B. Vista et al.
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE (2009)
Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuation
Riccardo Scarpa et al.
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS (2009)
Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey
Mirta Galesic et al.
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY (2009)
Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why
Riccardo Scarpa et al.
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2008)
Reliability of individual valuations of public and private goods: Choice consistency, response time, and preference refinement
Thomas C. Brown et al.
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS (2008)
The use of client-side paradata in analyzing the effects of visual layout on changing responses in Web surveys
Michael J. Stern
FIELD METHODS (2008)
Fast times and easy questions: The effects of age, experience and question complexity on web survey response times
Ting Yan et al.
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2008)
Ambivalent statements in contingent valuation studies: inclusive response formats and giving respondents time to think
Henrik Svedsater
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2007)
Circadian rhythms in cognitive performance: Methodological constraints, protocols, theoretical underpinnings
Katharina Blatter et al.
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR (2007)
Reliability of stated preferences for cholera and typhoid vaccines with time to think in Hue, Vietnam
Joseph Cook et al.
ECONOMIC INQUIRY (2007)
Means matter, but variance matter too: Decomposing response latency influences on variance heterogeneity in stated preference experiments
John M. Rose et al.
MARKETING LETTERS (2006)
Assessing the influence of design dimensions on stated choice experiment estimates
S Caussade et al.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL (2005)
Explaining response latencies and changing answers using client-side paradata from a web survey
D Heerwegh
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2003)
Transport stated choice responses: effects of task complexity, presentation format and literacy
T Arentze et al.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW (2003)
Valuing the non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group-based approaches
DC Macmillan et al.
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS (2002)
Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: The effects of complexity on choice consistency
JR DeShazo et al.
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (2002)
A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs
J Swait
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL (2001)
Choice environment, market complexity, and consumer behavior: A theoretical and empirical approach for incorporating decision complexity into models of consumer choice
J Swait et al.
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES (2001)
The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: A latent class model of decision strategy switching
J Swait et al.
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH (2001)
Web surveys - Perceptions of burden
SD Crawford et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2001)
Usability evaluation of computer-assisted survey instruments
MP Couper
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW (2000)
Response latencies in the analysis of conjoint choice experiments
R Haaijer et al.
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH (2000)
分享论文
