4.7 Article

A standard function to evaluate optimal absorption and desorption temperature of SO2 absorbent: Taking amine alkyl organosilicon as example

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120634

关键词

Amine alkyl organosilicon; Optimal absorption and desorption; temperature; capture of SO2; Objective function; Enthalpy and entropy change

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22068016, 21666011]
  2. Yunnan prov-ince high level talents special support plan [YNWR-QNBJ-2018-369]
  3. Analysis and Measure Foundation of Kunming University of Science and Technology [2020 M20192208031, 2018 T20090102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A low viscous and high thermal stable compound was synthesized by two steps reaction, showing high reaction enthalpy and entropy change. Its regeneration sensible heat consumption is the lowest, with optimal absorption and desorption temperature. Considering the optimal temperature range of adsorbents is crucial for evaluating their performance.
A low viscous and high thermal stable dibutyl-(1,1-dimethyl-3,3,3-triphenyl-disiloxanylmethyl)-amine (DDTDA) was synthesized by two steps reaction. Its reaction enthalpy and entropy change with SO2 were found to be-85.39 kJ/mol and-244 J mol(-1) K-1, whose absolute value are much higher than those of ionic liquids (ILs) and deep eutectic solvents (DESs). An objective function was proposed to balance reversible capacity and regeneration sensible heat consumption per unit absorption capacity. Based on it, the optimal absorption and desorption temperature of DDTDA were calculated and the temperature difference was found to be much lower than those of ILs and DESs, which implied its regeneration sensible heat is the lowest. According to the function, the traditional method to evaluate two absorbents by simply comparing their capacities at a certain temperature is unscientific. Different absorbents have different optimal absorption and desorption temperature range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据