4.7 Article

HKUST-1-Derived Cu@Cu(I)@Cu(II)/Carbon adsorbents for ciprofloxacin removal with high adsorption performance

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120647

关键词

Adsorption; Metal-organic framework; Derived carbon; Metal-organic complexation; Ciprofloxacin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [52170087]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the adsorptive removal of the model quinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin (CIP) from wastewater using a metal-organic framework (MOF)-derived carbon. The HDC-1100 carbon material showed a high adsorption capacity for CIP due to metal-organic complexation, electrostatic interactions, and hydrogen bonding. The study also evaluated the effects of environmental factors on the adsorption capacity.
Considering the increasingly serious levels of antibiotic pollution, it is necessary to find new and efficient ad-sorbents. In this study, the adsorptive removal of a model quinolone antibiotic, ciprofloxacin (CIP), from wastewater is presented using a metal-organic framework (MOF)-derived carbon. HKUST-1-derived carbon (HDC-1100) was obtained by high-temperature carbonization of the 3HKUST-1 precursor at 1100 degrees C. HDC-1100 has a regular octahedron shape decorated with Cu/Cu2O particles and has a microporous and mesoporous structure with abundant oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface. Within 48 h, HDC-1100 could reach adsorption equilibrium for 30 mg.L-1 CIP, and the kinetic data were fitted with a pseudo-first-order model and a pseudo-second-order model. In this study, the maximum adsorption capacity of HDC-1100 for CIP was as high as 592 mg.g(-1). The high adsorption capacity is attributed mainly to metal-organic complexation, electrostatic interactions, and hydrogen bonding. Also, the effects of environmental factors, such as pH, ionic strength, and humic acid, on the adsorption capacity were considered. This study is significant for the treatment of high-concentration antibiotic-polluted wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据