4.7 Article

Selectivity mechanisms in resistive-type metal oxide heterostructural gas sensors

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 355, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131242

关键词

SMOX sensors; Selectivity; Electronic sensitization; Chemical sensitization; Heterostructure

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1609142]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Materials Research [1609142] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on resistive-type semiconducting metal oxide sensors focuses on improving sensor selectivity to differentiate between different gas species, but there are still challenges in applying this technology in real-world settings.
Resistive-type semiconducting metal oxide (SMOX) sensors offer exciting possibilities for designing sensing systems that can detect extremely low concentrations of gasses relevant for industrial applications, environmental monitoring, and human health and safety. Research on this technology has produced sensors with high response, but the ability to predictively design sensing systems for specific applications requires improvements in selective detection. Gas selectivity is necessary to differentiate between multiple gas species that may be present in a given application. This has prevented wide-spread use of this technology in real-world settings. In this work, studies on gas selectivity in semiconducting metal oxide sensors are reviewed with specific emphasis on heterojunctions and fundamental sensing mechanisms. Concepts relating both to receptive and transduction sensor mechanisms are explained. The effects due to gas surface interactions and electronic equilibration are compared and discussed. Both modeling efforts and experimental literature are presented to explain fundamental mechanisms that control sensor behavior. Sensor selectivity is examined to further both fundamental understanding as well as increase real-world applications of semiconducting metal oxides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据