4.6 Article

A Tightly Coupled LiDAR-Inertial SLAM for Perceptually Degraded Scenes

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22083063

关键词

perceptually degraded scenes; LiDAR; IMU; state estimation; SLAM

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51975468, 50674075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a SLAM algorithm based on tightly coupled LiDAR-IMU fusion, which achieves high accuracy, real-time performance, and robustness for perceptually degraded scenes.
Realizing robust six degrees of freedom (6DOF) state estimation and high-performance simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) for perceptually degraded scenes (such as underground tunnels, corridors, and roadways) is a challenge in robotics. To solve these problems, we propose a SLAM algorithm based on tightly coupled LiDAR-IMU fusion, which consists of two parts: front end iterative Kalman filtering and back end pose graph optimization. Firstly, on the front end, an iterative Kalman filter is established to construct a tightly coupled LiDAR-Inertial Odometry (LIO). The state propagation process for the a priori position and attitude of a robot, which uses predictions and observations, increases the accuracy of the attitude and enhances the system robustness. Second, on the back end, we deploy a keyframe selection strategy to meet the real-time requirements of large-scale scenes. Moreover, loop detection and ground constraints are added to the tightly coupled framework, thereby further improving the overall accuracy of the 6DOF state estimation. Finally, the performance of the algorithm is verified using a public dataset and the dataset we collected. The experimental results show that for perceptually degraded scenes, compared with existing LiDAR-SLAM algorithms, our proposed algorithm grants the robot higher accuracy, real-time performance and robustness, effectively reducing the cumulative error of the system and ensuring the global consistency of the constructed maps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据