4.6 Article

Multilabel Classification Methods for Human Activity Recognition: A Comparison of Algorithms

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22062353

关键词

activity recognition; multilabel classification; smart home; ambient sensors; ensemble learning

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund of the European Union
  2. Greek national funds through the operational program, Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH-CREATE-INNOVATE [TDEK 00343]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the population ages and access to ambient sensors becomes easier, activity recognition in smart home installations has gained increased scientific interest. While most previous studies focused on recognizing activities of single residents, this study investigates activity recognition for multiple residents concurrently, treating it as a multilabel classification problem. Experimental comparison of different algorithms showed that using multilabel classification can accurately recognize activities performed by multiple people.
As the world's population is aging, and since access to ambient sensors has become easier over the past years, activity recognition in smart home installations has gained increased scientific interest. The majority of published papers in the literature focus on single-resident activity recognition. While this is an important area, especially when focusing on elderly people living alone, multi-resident activity recognition has potentially more applications in smart homes. Activity recognition for multiple residents acting concurrently can be treated as a multilabel classification problem (MLC). In this study, an experimental comparison between different MLC algorithms is attempted. Three different techniques were implemented: RAkEL d , classifier chains, and binary relevance. These methods are evaluated using the ARAS and CASAS public datasets. Results obtained from experiments have shown that using MLC can recognize activities performed by multiple people with high accuracy. While RAkEL(d )had the best performance, the rest of the methods had on-par results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据