4.6 Article

A Lightweight Hybrid Deep Learning Privacy Preserving Model for FC-Based Industrial Internet of Medical Things

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22062112

关键词

security; IoT network; BLSTM; privacy; PoW; blockchain; smart contracts

资金

  1. King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia
  2. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Industrial Internet of Things is becoming increasingly important as it integrates various technologies and applications. To address the security and privacy issues in IIoT networks, a blockchain-based deep-learning framework is proposed, which provides two levels of security and privacy protection.
The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) is gaining importance as most technologies and applications are integrated with the IIoT. Moreover, it consists of several tiny sensors to sense the environment and gather the information. These devices continuously monitor, collect, exchange, analyze, and transfer the captured data to nearby devices or servers using an open channel, i.e., internet. However, such centralized system based on IIoT provides more vulnerabilities to security and privacy in IIoT networks. In order to resolve these issues, we present a blockchain-based deep-learning framework that provides two levels of security and privacy. First a blockchain scheme is designed where each participating entities are registered, verified, and thereafter validated using smart contract based enhanced Proof of Work, to achieve the target of security and privacy. Second, a deep-learning scheme with a Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) technique for privacy and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) for intrusion detection is designed. The experimental results are based on the IoT-Botnet and ToN-IoT datasets that are publicly available. The proposed simulations results are compared with the benchmark models and it is validated that the proposed framework outperforms the existing system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据