4.6 Article

Research on a Real-Time Estimation Method of Vehicle Sideslip Angle Based on EKF

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22093386

关键词

extended Kalman filter (EKF); vehicle sideslip angle; least squares method; dynamical model; root mean square error (RMSE)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875235]
  2. State Scholarship Funding of CSC [202008320074]
  3. Industry-University-Research Cooperation Project of Jiangsu Province [BY2021227, BY2021268]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Changzhou [CZ20210033]
  5. Automobile Environmental Protection Innovation Leading Plan of FAW Volkswagen
  6. China Environmental Protection Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, a real-time vehicle sideslip angle state observer based on the EKF algorithm is proposed. The observer model is established by combining the EKF and least squares methods, with a self-adapted truncation procedure. The calculation of the Jacobi matrix is transformed into the frequency domain, and a self-adapted update noise estimation method and an initial value setting strategy are proposed. Hardware-in-the-loop simulation is carried out to verify and analyze the real-time reliability of the estimation method using RMSE.
In this article, a real-time vehicle sideslip angle state observer is proposed, which is based on the EKF algorithm. Firstly, based on a 2-DOF dynamical model and the tire lateral force model, the vehicle sideslip angle state observer model with a self-adapted truncation procedure is established by combining the EKF and the least squares methods. The calculation of the Jacobi matrix in the time domain is transformed into a calculation in the frequency domain. A self-adapted update noise estimation method and an initial value setting strategy are proposed as well. Finally, a hardware-in-the-loop simulation is carried out by Matlab/Simulink-CarSim-dSPACE, and the real-time reliability of the estimation method is verified and analyzed by RMSE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据