4.6 Article

Evaluation of Different Landslide Susceptibility Models for a Local Scale in the Chitral District, Northern Pakistan

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22093107

关键词

LANDSAT-8; machine learning (ML) techniques; logistic regression (LGR); linear regression (LR); support vector machines (SVM); analytical hierarchy process (AHP); landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs)

资金

  1. Institute of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence (IARAI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the performance of three machine learning techniques and two multi-criteria decision-making methods for mapping landslide susceptibility in the Chitral district. The study also creates landslide inventory maps from satellite images using the change vector analysis method. The accuracy assessment shows that the machine learning techniques outperform the multi-criteria decision-making methods, with support vector machines achieving the highest accuracy.
This work evaluates the performance of three machine learning (ML) techniques, namely logistic regression (LGR), linear regression (LR), and support vector machines (SVM), and two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, namely analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), for mapping landslide susceptibility in the Chitral district, northern Pakistan. Moreover, we create landslide inventory maps from LANDSAT-8 satellite images through the change vector analysis (CVA) change detection method. The change detection yields more than 500 landslide spots. After some manual post-processing correction, the landslide inventory spots are randomly split into two sets with a 70/30 ratio for training and validating the performance of the ML techniques. Sixteen topographical, hydrological, and geological landslide-related factors of the study area are prepared as GIS layers. They are used to produce landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) with weighted overlay techniques using different weights of landslide-related factors. The accuracy assessment shows that the ML techniques outperform the MCDM methods, while SVM yields the highest accuracy of 88% for the resulting LSM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据