4.6 Article

Field Evaluation and Calibration of Low-Cost Air Pollution Sensors for Environmental Exposure Research

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22062381

关键词

particulate matter; AirBeam2; low-cost sensors; urban environments; different aggregated temporal units; sensor calibration

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council (General Research Fund) [14605920, 14611621, C4023-20GF]
  2. Research Committee on Research Sustainability of Major Research Grants Council Funding Schemes of the Chinese University of Hong Kong
  3. RGC Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [PDFS2021-4S08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper evaluates and calibrates data collected by low-cost particulate matter (PM) sensors in different environments and using different temporal units. The results show high linearity and correlation between the data reported by the sensors in different environments. The accuracy and bias of the data are affected by weather and environmental factors, and increasing the aggregation level of the temporal units improves the correlation between the data.
This paper seeks to evaluate and calibrate data collected by low-cost particulate matter (PM) sensors in different environments and using different aggregated temporal units (i.e., 5-s, 1-min, 10-min, 30 min intervals). We first collected PM concentrations (i.e., PM1, PM2.5, and PM10) data in five different environments (i.e., indoor and outdoor of an office building, a train platform and lobby of a subway station, and a seaside location) in Hong Kong, using five AirBeam2 sensors as the low-cost sensors and a TSI DustTrak DRX Aerosol Monitor 8533 as the reference sensor. By comparing the collected PM concentrations, we found high linearity and correlation between the data reported by the AirBeam2 sensors in different environments. Furthermore, the results suggest that the accuracy and bias of the PM data reported by the AirBeam2 sensors are affected by rainy weather and environments with high humidity and a high level of hygroscopic salts (i.e., a seaside location). In addition, increasing the aggregation level of the temporal units (i.e., from 5-s to 30 min intervals) increases the correlation between the PM concentrations obtained by the AirBeam2 sensors, while it does not significantly improve the accuracy and bias of the data. Lastly, our results indicate that using a machine learning model (i.e., random forest) for the calibration of PM concentrations collected on sunny days generates better results than those obtained with multiple linear models. These findings have important implications for researchers when designing environmental exposure studies based on low-cost PM sensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据