4.6 Article

Metabolic reservoir cycles in cancer

期刊

SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 180-188

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.03.023

关键词

Metabolic reservoir; Cancer metabolism; N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate (NAAG); Lactate; Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01-CA193895, R01-CA112314, 1S10OD025226-01, UL1 TR001079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the defining features of cancer cells is their ability to reprogram metabolism to meet their needs. Recent research has shown that cancer cells can store vital metabolites for later use, providing new insights into potential cancer treatment strategies.
Cancer cells possess various biological processes to ensure survival and proliferation even under unfavorable conditions such as hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, and oxidative stress. One of the defining hallmarks of cancer cells is their ability to reprogram their metabolism to suit their needs. Building on over a decade of research in the field of cancer metabolism, numerous unique metabolic capabilities are still being discovered in the present day. One recent discovery in the field of cancer metabolism that was hitherto unexpected is the ability of cancer cells to store vital metabolites in forms that can be readily converted to glucose and glutamine for later use. We called these forms metabolic reservoirs. While many studies have been conducted on storage molecules such as glycogen, triglyceride, and phosphocreatine (PCr), few have explored the concept of metabolic reservoirs for cancer as a whole. In this review, we will provide an overview of this concept, the previously known reservoirs including glycogen, triglyceride, and PCr, and the new discoveries made including the newly discovered reservoirs such as N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate (NAAG), lactate, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). We will also discuss whether disrupting these reservoir cycles may be a new avenue for cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据