4.7 Article

Decoupling the roles of constituent phases in the strengthening of hydrogenated nanocrystalline dual-phase high-entropy alloys

期刊

SCRIPTA MATERIALIA
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114472

关键词

High-entropy alloy; Dual phase; Nanocrystalline; Hydrogen; Nanoindentation

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2020R1A2B5B01001446, 2020R1A5A6017701]
  2. Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A* STAR) of Singapore [A18B1b0061]
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [21K04694]
  4. MEXT, Japan [18H05451]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H05451, 21K04694] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the effects of hydrogen on the thermal desorption and nanoindentation responses of nanocrystalline dual-phase alloys and coarse-grained alloys, showing that the FCC phase is more susceptible to hydrogen-induced hardening than the BCC phase. However, this difference is negated in the nanocrystalline samples.
Nanocrystalline (NC) dual-phase Al0.7CoCrFeNi HEAs containing face-centered cubic (FCC) and body-centered cubic (BCC) microstructural phases were fabricated by high-pressure torsion (HPT). The influences of hydrogen on the thermal desorption and nanoindentation responses of NC HEA were compared with the coarse-grained alloy. The plastic zone size and indentation size effects were carefully considered to identify the distinct contributions of the constituent phases to the hardness and its variation with hydrogen charging. Results show that the FCC phase is susceptible to a larger degree of hydrogen-induced hardening than the BCC phase. Such difference is negated in the NC samples. These results are discussed in terms of the distinct responses of FCC and BCC HEA phases to hydrogen and the governing deformation mechanisms in coarse grained and NC samples. (C)& nbsp;& nbsp;2021 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据