期刊
SCIENTOMETRICS
卷 127, 期 5, 页码 2479-2520出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04332-7
关键词
Method entities; Entity extraction; Entity evaluation; Entity platform
资金
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [72074113]
This article provides a systematic review of the extraction of method entities from academic literature and explores the use of these entities in building knowledge services. By defining and reviewing various approaches for extracting and evaluating method entities, as well as examining the construction of new applications, this study offers insights for researchers in understanding and selecting appropriate research methods.
In scientific research, the method is an indispensable means to solve scientific problems and a critical research object. With the advancement of sciences, many scientific methods are being proposed, modified, and used in academic literature. The authors describe details of the method in the abstract and body text, and key entities in academic literature reflecting names of the method are called method entities. Exploring diverse method entities in a tremendous amount of academic literature helps scholars understand existing methods, select the appropriate method for research tasks, and propose new methods. Furthermore, the evolution of method entities can reveal the development of a discipline and facilitate knowledge discovery. Therefore, this article offers a systematic review of methodological and empirical works focusing on extracting method entities from full-text academic literature and efforting to build knowledge services using these extracted method entities. Definitions of key concepts involved in this review were first proposed. Based on these definitions, we systematically reviewed the approaches and indicators to extract and evaluate method entities, with a strong focus on the pros and cons of each approach. We also surveyed how extracted method entities were used to build new applications. Finally, limitations in existing works as well as potential next steps were discussed.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据